Last week, the Supreme Court delivered its decision in Agar v County Court of Victoria [2010] VSC 506, which was an application for judicial review of a County Court case on appeal from the Magistrates' Court.Mr Agar was accused of speeding, with his alleged speed detected by a Gatsometer MRC System speed camera. (The offence …
Continue reading Agar v Dolheguy & Anor [2010] VSC 506: can't get no satisfaction
Last week, the Supreme Court delivered its decision in Agar v County Court of Victoria [2010] VSC 506, which was an application for judicial review of a County Court case on appeal from the Magistrates' Court.Mr Agar was accused of speeding, with his alleged speed detected by a Gatsometer MRC System speed camera. (The offence …
Continue reading Agar v Dolheguy & Anor [2010] VSC 506: can’t get no satisfaction
The Supreme Court delivered its decision in two drink-driving cases yesterday.The first was DPP v Piscopo [2010] VSC 498. (For all the non-Maltese speakers reading this, Piscopo is pronounced Pis-cŏ-pō — short ‘o’, long ‘o’.) The second was DPP v Rukandin [2010] VSC 499. Both were very similar cases, with very similar reasons for decision.A …
Continue reading DPP v Piscopo & DPP v Rukandin : notice required of 3-hour limit for refusals
The Supreme Court delivered its decision in two drink-driving cases yesterday.The first was DPP v Piscopo [2010] VSC 498. (For all the non-Maltese speakers reading this, Piscopo is pronounced Pis-cŏ-pō — short ‘o’, long ‘o’.) The second was DPP v Rukandin [2010] VSC 499. Both were very similar cases, with very similar reasons for decision.A …
Continue reading DPP v Piscopo & DPP v Rukandin : notice required of 3-hour limit for refusals
With the Government in caretaker mode, all media announcements are now published on political party websites, rather than the government media site.An interesting one released today by the ALP is a plan to webcast court cases!This report in The Age has a snippet from morning radio where Mr Brumby says he hasn't yet spoken to …